Field Methods
Archaeological findings that can address some of
the topics relating to community organization if the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, the communal use of space around
a community structure during pre-Revolutionary, Revolutionary and early federal periods, and the development and evolution
of the meeting house throughout the nineteenth century.
Features that will be looked for during the Site
Examination that have the potential to add to our understanding of these topics include the builder’s trench associated
with the structure, deposits or anomalies in the yard outside of the structure possibly related to the position of fence lines
or posts, , artifacts relating to the temporal period of use and the patterns of use outside and inside any possible structures,
artifacts and anomalies relating to potential Native American occupation of the site prior to the arrival of the settlers
in the 1630s These findings will be combined with the background research that is designed to identify the history of the
property.
One of the purposes of the site examination is to
help determine National Register eligibility by identifying what categories sites would fall under in the Register. This site
may be eligible for nomination under Criteria D as a historic or prehistoric For the purpose of this site examination characteristics of the area within and surrounding any structures identified
will be examined include two areas of research. The first are the processes or relationships that have been instrumental in
shaping the environment such as spatial organization, land uses and activities, responses to natural features, and cultural
traditions. The second are the physical components or features that make up the environment such as circulation networks,
boundaries, vegetation related to land use, structural types, cluster arrangements, archaeological sites, small scale elements
and perceptual qualities (McClelland et al 1990: 4-8).
Research questions for this project include the following:
-are there prehistoric archaeological deposits present within the project area
-how does any of the prehistoric material recovered relate to the two know
prehistoric sites located within
and adjacent to the project area
-can the prehistoric assemblage be used to provide a better understanding of
the assemblages and archaeology
identified at the two previously identified
archaeological sites
-are their architecturally related anomalies and deposits present within the
Second Meeting House Site project
area
-if deposits are present, can they be determined to be related to the 17th or
18th century meeting houses believed to stand on or near the project area
-can the historic archaeological artifact assemblage be used to provide a better
understanding of the nature
of the use of the meeting house and its surrounding
yard
-are their potential 17th century human burials present within the project area
Site examination testing is conducted for two main goals: the determination of
the boundaries of the site and gaining a better understanding of the site's age,
contents, integrity and function so that the significance of the site can be
assessed. Site Examination testing will be limited to the area owned and
maintained by the Duxbury Rural and Historical Society. The purpose of the
Site Examination will be to give a preliminary definition of the size, data
contents and spatial arrangement of artifacts and features, especially any
structural elements such as building trench, floor deposits and material within
the adjacent foundation, for the purpose of assessing the site's integrity,
research potential, and significance, and in order to make an opinion of the
potential eligibility of the site for inclusion in the National and State Register of
Historic Places. Site Examination testing will also seek to identify any elements
relating to native American occupation, with the goal being to help provide a
better understanding of the tow sites located within and adjacent tot he project
area.
Testing Strategy
The project area is expected to have a high archaeological potential to yield
evidence of prehistoric and historic use of this area of Duxbury. The site
contains one known prehistoric site dating to the early Archaic and Woodland
periods, and is adjacent to another significant prehistoric site, the Howland
orchard site. The topography, soil characteristics, distance to water and
distance to a suspected Native trail, indicates that even without the presence of
two other previously identified sites, the project area would maintain a high
sensitivity for prehistoric resources. The project area also has a high sensitivity
for containing potential historic resources. It is located adjacent tot he ancient
burial ground in Duxbury, the oldest maintained burial ground in America, it is
adjacent to a known historic road, and it is the suspected location of at least
the second (and possibly the first) meeting house in the town. Geographically it
is located at the center of a community core, Morton's Hole, dating from the
town's initial settlement and occupies a prominent rise within the town, making
it an elevated and visible location, predictably the type of location that meeting
houses were often situated on.
Proposed archaeological testing will take three forms. The first is a ground
penetrating radar survey to be performed by Russ Kempton, Principal of New
England Geophysical. Mr. Kempton will be responsible
for designing and
conducting the GPR survey and providing a report
of its results for inclusion in
the report. Mr. Kempton has had over 27 years
of experience in geophysical
field surveys and has worked with law enforcement
agencies, among others, in
identifying single and mass burials.
The GPR survey will be conducted to locate anomalies that
may be associated
with the meeting house, grave shafts, or other features associated
with the
property’s historical development. A scan focusing
on depths from 12” to 10’ will
be used for this purpose. The full extent (such as grid size)
and potential (such as
surveying the basement) of the GPR survey will be determined
in the field by Mr.
Kempton. This type of survey will provide a noninvasive snapshot
of subsurface
conditions that cannot otherwise be accomplished.
As GPR can only show that an anomaly exists below the surface
and it is not
possible to determine exactly what that anomaly is field
testing or ground truthing
of the anomalies identified by the GPR survey will be important
to state with any
degree of certainty what is or is not present in the Project
Area. After the data is
collected in the field component of the survey, all scans
will be analyzed in a
computer program. The results of the computer analysis coupled
with the
beginning and ending depths of the identified mass and Mr.
Kempton’s years of
experience with this type of survey will be the identification
of potential anomalies,
if they exist, within the Project Area. These locations will
be ground-truthed.
Excavation will be conducted through the use of appropriately
sized excavation
units, as determined by the Project Archaeologist and Mr.
Kempton, and placed
so that they expose the anomaly. Anomalies will not be excavated
at this time,
only photographically and graphically recorded and left in
situ. Ground truthing will
also be carried out in areas where GPR surveys revealed the
presence of no
anomalies. This will be done in order to test if the GPR
survey correctly identified
areas anomaly sterile areas as well as locations of potential
anomalies.
If any human remains are revealed, excavation will cease, the area will be
protected from further impact, and the State Archaeologist will be contacted
immediately. It is understood that according to the Massachusetts Unmarked
Burial Law and regulations governing archaeological investigations under
permit, no authorization is provided to archaeologists to excavated human
remains without a Special Permit (950 CMR 70.20).
Following the GPR survey, sampling of the plowzone
will be carried out
through the use of 50 cm square test pits that will be excavated at the 5 meter
grid intersection points in order to gather
a sample of the plowzone/ A1
horizon and to help delimit the site boundaries
and investigate the integrity of
the site. Test pit excavation will be carried
out in 5 cm levels with the natural
soil horizon and will be limited to the
excavation of the A1/ plowzone.
Excavation will not be carried out into
the subsoil. Adjacent excavations may
be conducted in order to more fully expose
any anomalies encountered in the
test pits. Upon reaching the subsoil, the
subsoil surface will be scraped clean,
and recorded photographically and through
the use of hand drawings and
written descriptions. No excavation will be carried out into the subsoil.
The project area measures 34.7 m on the south
(Chestnut St.) side, 47.6 m on
the east side, 38 m on the west side and 31 m.
on the north side. Employing a
five-meter grid, it is expected that a total of 63 test pits will need to
be
excavated on the five meter grid.
Because the project area is located adjacent to the ancient burial ground, the
possibility does exist that unmarked burials
or disarticulated elements from
previously disturbed burials could be encountered.
Any bone that is
encountered will be field evaluated by the
Principal Investigator to determine if
it could possibly be human. If the possibility
exists that the bone may be
human, the State Archaeologist will be notified
and it is understood that
according to the Massachusetts Unmarked
Burial Law and regulations
governing archaeological investigations
under permit, no authorization is
provided to archaeologists to excavated
human remains without a Special
Permit (950 CMR 70.20).
All soil will be screened through archaeological screens fitted with 1/4 inch
hardware cloth. All artifacts recovered will be placed into separate bags by
unit and level for cleaning and cataloging following fieldwork. Detailed notes
will be kept for each of the excavation units, test trenches and test pits. These
notes will include descriptions of soil colors and textures as well as scale
drawing of all test units, trenches and pits.
The Duxbury Rural and Historical Society would like to have all artifacts
recovered as well as the original field notes, photographs and video be
deposited and curated at the Duxbury Rural and
Historical Society's Drew
Archival Library, located within the Wright Building
at 147 St. George Street,
Duxbury, Ma. The Wright Building was the home
of the Duxbury Free Library
until 1997 when the Library relocated to a much
larger, newly renovated
space. In 2005, the Town of Duxbury voted to appropriate
Community
Preservation Funds to restore and adapt the Wright
Building for new uses. The
original 1909 wing of the library has been restored
to it's early 20th century
appearance. The Duxbury Rural and Historical Society
utilizes the fully
climate-controlled facility to preserve their
large collection of historic
documents and make them available to the public.
The DRHS also hired an
archivist, Kerry Durkin, to manage the facility.
The Principal Investigator will carry out the fieldwork assisted by DRHS and
approved volunteers. MAP is well supplied with shovels, screens, tarps, soil
sample and artifact collection bags, Munsell Soil Color charts, compasses,
tape measures, flagging tape and all other materials needed to successfully
carry out field investigations. If the need arises we have sources for transits
and other fine scale mapping equipment.
F. Justification for Field Investigations
The project area of the Second Meeting House Site has a high potential for
containing both prehistoric and historic archaeological resources. Two
previously recorded prehistoric archaeological sites are located within or
adjacent to the project area. Both sites were collected at or excavated by the
members of the Massachusetts Archaeological Society and full field reports on
the nature of the archaeology at these sites is lacking. The collections from the
sites are also not curated in any single location but are maintained by the
individual excavators Both of these factors limit the amount of knowledge that
can be gained from their excavation, making it difficult to fully understand the
nature and significance of the occupations represented by them. Site
examination testing at the Second Meeting House Site has the potential to
provide a more detailed and professional examination of this area of Duxbury
and to allow for a better understanding of the avocational collections and
findings. The site also has a high historic archaeological potential. The project
area existed within the center of one of the first settlement nodes formed
following the initial settlement at Plymouth. It has the potential for revealing
information relating to the construction and utilization of both the first and
second meeting houses and also generally of the 17th century occupation in the
town of Duxbury itself. The project area is owned and maintained by the
Duxbury Rural and Historical Society, an independent non-profit organization
which is fully funding the project, and thus the project is not under and local,
state, or federal review. The DRHS believes that the site examination will
allow them to gain a better understanding of this piece of property that they
maintain, it will allow them the opportunity to promote both their goals of
education and preservation of historic and cultural resources, and to help
promote the need for conservation and preservation of cultural and historical
resources within the town as a whole. Excavation will be limited to the A1/
plowzone, and as a result the site integrity will be only slightly impacted and the
more significant intact prehistoric and historic deposits present in the subsoil
will be preserved for future excavation and testing. A site examination is
justified to investigate the project area to gather sufficient information to
determine whether the archaeological deposits associated with property are
eligible for listing in the National and State Register of Historic Places by
determining the limits of the deposits, and to assess their integrity, significance
and research potential of the site.